· 12/29/2004
Nasha L.L.C. v. City of Los Angeles
Citations
- 22 Cal. Rptr. 3d 772
- 125 Cal. App. 4th 470
- 35 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20007
- 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11410
- 2004 Daily Journal DAR 15369
- 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 2247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the Planning Commission’s decision was tainted by bias and must be vacated, it is unnecessary to address Nasha’s other contentions”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.