Nash v. Pennsylvania R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant’s argument was not preserved where his argument on appeal was “qualitatively different than the contentions that [the] defendant [had] advanced below”
• concluding that the defendant’s argument was not preserved where his argument on appeal was “qualitatively different than the contentions that defen- dant advanced below”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).