Nash v. Nash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the entry of an IDO solely for the payment of attorney’s fees on the basis that such an order is not sanctioned by section 61.1301 (citation omitted)
• reversed the entry of an income deduction order, where the order was solely for the payment of attorney’s fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rose v. Rose
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-22· cited 6×
• Colligan v. Colligan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-17· cited 5×
• Spalding v. Spalding
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-24· cited 5×
• Silversmith v. Silversmith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-24· cited 4×
• Diaz v. Diaz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-29· cited 2×
• Reynolds v. Reynolds
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-21
• Damaris Torres-Melendez v. Juan Melendez-Andrade
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-05-22

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Humana Health Plans v. Lawton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-31· cited 16×
• Mueller v. Mueller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-02-04· cited 4×