Nash v. Consolidated City of Jacksonville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that eliminating Jacksonville’s “rule of one” would “open the [promotional] process to favoritism, politics and tokenism, just what the City is trying to avoid by using the rule of one”
• stating that a reliability coefficient “above 0.70 is considered to be reliable”
• upholding Jacksonville’s “rule of one” where the promotional exam was “highly reliable and the City demonstrated the substantial job-relatedness of the exam”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).