Skip to main content
· 2/7/2012

Nash v. Clark County District Attorney's Office (In Re Nash)

Citations

  • 464 B.R. 874
  • 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 635
  • 56 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining in the “interests of justice” to 7 remand simply because bankruptcy court heard and determined 8 discharge violation claim in an adversary proceeding rather than 9 in a contested matter
  • no abuse of discretion in declining to award sanctions because creditors did not acknowledge discharge injunction was applicable to their claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pappas, Jury, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.