Nash Finch Co. v. Preston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a contrary rule would lead to the \absurd\ result of making a law firm potentially \susceptible to the jurisdiction of every state in the union\
• explaining that a contrary rule would lead to the “absurd” result of making a law firm potentially “susceptible to the jurisdiction of every state in the union”
• to establish purposeful availment “out-of-state lawyer must do more than merely communicate with persons in the forum state at the client’s behest”
• no Minnesota jurisdiction over Kentucky lawyer who sent opinion letter to Minnesota where letter was executed in Kentucky and loan proceeds were distributed there
• no jurisdiction, however, in part because contacts did not evince purposeful availment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).