Nash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that if the nature of an employee’s environment, however unpleasant, is not due to his membership in a protected class, he has not been a victim of discrimination
• one-off comments and incidents, even over the course of three years, did not show the workplace “was permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult”
• “[T]he documents Plaintiffs submitted in support of their opposition motion were neither signed nor authenticated and, therefore, are inadmissible evidence for purposes of summary judgment.”
• “Evidence a supervisor knew of the harassing conduct suffices to establish constructive notice.”
• “Most, if not all, of Plaintiffs’ allegations consist of one time occurrences that took place over a period of three years. Even considering them in the totality, we can hardly say the environment was permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).