Skip to main content
· 3/6/1956

Naselli v. Holton

Citations

  • 138 F. Supp. 893
  • 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that there is a “liberal standard of relevancy” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.