Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• law of jurisdiction chosen by parties would not be applied where such law contravened Georgia’s public policy
• covenant against disclosure included “any information” related to the business of the employer
• first ascertaining whether there were significant contacts with the state of Georgia, such that the choice of our law was neither arbitrary nor constitutionally impermissible, before engaging in choice of law analysis
• period of restriction over by time of final appeal
• “The law of the jurisdiction chosen by parties to a contract to govern their contractual rights will not be applied by Georgia courts where application of the chosen law would contravene the policy of, or would be prejudicial to the interests of, this state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).