Narvaez v. Wilshire Credit Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, under Texas law, bank’s conflicting messages regarding status of loan “[fell] short of the positive and unconditional repudiation necessary to maintain a cause of action for anticipatory breach”
• finding that defendant did not breach contract where plaintiff’s nonperformance was not the result of any action by defendant
• finding that plaintiff could not recover under Texas law for negligent misrepresentation where mortgagor’s injuries were only for economic loss to the subject matter of his contract with loan servicer and mortgagee, and thus his claim sounded only in contract
• denying summary judgment on a plaintiff’s TDCA claim because the defendant unnecessarily required the plaintiff to pay for force-placed insurance
• dismissing a declaratory judgment claim as “redundant” where it was asserted alongside a claim for breach of contract
• dismissing negligent misrepresentation claim where mortgagor’s injuries were only for economic loss to the subject matter of his contract with loan servicer and mortgagee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).