Skip to main content
· 1/26/1996

Narum v. Eli Lilly and Co.

Citations

  • 914 F. Supp. 317
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1552
  • 1996 WL 54500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excluding paralegal’s affidavit that lacked foundation and details regarding basis of personal knowledge from summary judgment record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Magnuson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.