Narragansett Electric Co. v. Carbone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a \trial justice in a jury-waived trial may be afforded great latitude to determine what testimony may be properly characterized as expert testimony\
• stating that the second element — appreciation of the benefit — is satisfied where the party profits from the benefit
• stating that the rule for evidentiary hearings requires the challenger to present some proof to substantiate his or her claim that the method in question is scientifically invalid
• stating that the first element of unjust enrichment is satisfied by a showing that improvements are made to property, materials are furnished, or services are rendered without payment
• explaining, with respect to unjust enrichment, that “a benefit is conferred when ... services are rendered without payment ” (emphasis supplied)
• articulating the plaintiff’s burden of proof of a preponderance of the evidence for “most civil cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).