Narney v. Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that summary judgment was improper because the fact-finder could have inferred that the defendant's acts or omissions proximately caused the plaintiffs' injuries
• concluding that summary judgment was improper because the fact-finder could have inferred that the defendant’s acts or omissions proximately caused the plaintiffs’ injuries
• holding that hiring and retaining police officer who displayed unstable behavior was the proximate cause of injury to plaintiffs who were stopped and terrorized by the officer
• observing that determinations of proximate cause are generally questions of fact and that the fact that the employee was off duty was not dispositive
• observing that determinations of proximate cause are generally questions of fact and that the fact that the employee was off duty was not dispositive
• relying on statute to establish a duty that police departments hire and retain only mentally stable police officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).