Nardello v. Township of Voorhees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff alleged “thirty pages of incidents” that constituted adverse employment actions his employer took against him
• finding that even though Plaintiff had not been discharged, suspended or demoted, a jury could find that he had suffered a series of adverse employment actions by his employer because the employer withdrew certain benefits from Plaintiff previously provided
• reversing summary judgment, court found a plaintiff whose pay was not reduced still had made out a prima facie case of a CEPA violation
• \[N]ot every employment action that makes an employee unhappy constitutes 'an actionable adverse action.'\ (quoting Cokus v. Bristol Myers Squibb Co., 362 N.J. Super. 366, 378 (Law Div. 2002))
• \[N]ot every employment action that makes an employee unhappy constitutes 'an actionable adverse action.'\
• \[N]ot every employment action that makes an employee unhappy constitutes 'an actionable adverse action.'\ (quoting Cokus v. Bristol Myers Squibb Co., 362 N.J. Super. 366, 378 (Law Div. 2002), aff'd, 362 N.J. Super. 245 (App. Div. 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).