Naranjo v. Universal Surety of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Texas courts have stated that a plaintiff who cannot prove actual damages cannot ‘successfully maintain an action under the [TDCA]’”
• “Plaintiff is not attempting to challenge the validity of the state court default judgment itself, but rather Defendants’ practices in seeking to collect on the debt.”
• “Texas courts have stated that a plaintiff who cannot prove actual damages cannot ‘successfully maintain an action under the [TDCA].’” (quoting Jackson Law Office, 37 S.W.3d at 30–31)
• “A federal court is without personal jurisdiction over a defendant unless the defendant has been served with process in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.” (citing Omni Capital Intl, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co., 484 U.S. 97, 104 (1987

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).