Naquin v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that deliberate indiffer- ence of jailors to prisoner’s repeated complaints, over many days, that he was being held without a hearing shocked the conscience
• concluding that the deliberate indifference standard applied to the plaintiffs claim that his 57-day detention after his voluntary surrender without a court appearance, which occurred as a result of misfiled records, violated substantive due process
• stating that “this case invokes the ... substantive due process right identified in Coleman ” because the plaintiff had been detained pursuant to the functional equivalent of a criminal warrant
• analyzing a substantive due process claim for a detainee who voluntarily surrendered to a jail on a bench warrant
• analyzing a substantive due process claim for a detainee who voluntarily surrendered to a jail on a bench warrant
• discussing at length the analysis involved in determining if something shocks the conscience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).