NAPSTER, LLC v. Rounder Records Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s allegation that it “performed all of the terms and conditions required to be performed by it under the [] Agreement” was “merely a legal conclusion”
• concluding that “Napster’s contention that it is improper to resolve ‘a question of intention’ at the motion to dismiss stage is meritless” because “[t]here is nothing ambiguous about the 2006 Agreement”
• rejecting allegation that all conditions precedent had been performed as “merely a legal conclusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).