Skip to main content
· 1/15/1839

Napper v. Noland

Citations

  • 9 Port. 218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Having failed to specifically dispute the Defendant’s Proposed Findings of Uncontroverted Facts, the court deems those facts admitted. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.