Napoleonic Soc. of America, Inc. v. Snibbe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that final judgment entered during pendency of appellate review of a non-final order was a nullity
• calling final judgment a nullity when circuit court lacked jurisdiction due to pending nonfinal appeal
• treating final order entered in violation of Rule 9.130(f) as a \nullity\ and dismissing appeal therefrom sua sponte because Rule \9.130(f) prohibits the trial court from rendering a final order during the pendency of appellate review of a nonfinal order\
• “Because the final summary judgment was entered without jurisdiction, it is a nullity.”
• appellate court sua sponte dismisses appeal of final order because “[rule] 9.130(f) prohibits the trial court from rendering a final order during the pendency of appellate review of a nonfinal order” — an order rendered in violation of rule 9.130(f) is a “nullity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).