Nap, Inc. v. Shuttletex, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the requirements of the New York direct action statute are “integral predicates for stating and sustaining a cause of action under the statute”
• concluding, based on State Trading and Collins, that the New York direct action statute is a substantive law applicable in federal court
• noting the split in authority between deBruyne/Gravatt and Richards, and concluding that “[tjhis Court is persuaded by the reasoning in Richards”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).