Naomi Marsh v. Carolyn Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ errs by ignoring the opinion of a treating physician
• explaining that a district court may not find harmless error by “affirm[ing] the agency on a ground not invoked by the ALJ”
• finding the ALJ permissibly considered a gap in treatment when assessing the claimant’s subjective symptom testimony
• applying 7 harmless error standard when an ALJ ignored the medical opinion of a treating source
• remanding for further proceedings to allow the ALJ to.“comment on” the treating physician’s opinion
• “an ALJ cannot in its decision totally ignore a 15 treating doctor and his or her notes, without even mentioning them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).