Nansamba v. North Shore Medical Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the moving party must prove the culpable party’s culpable misconduct by clear and convincing evidence”
• affirming denial of Rule 60(b)(3) motion where “plaintiff had at her fingertips the records that would have laid bare what she now asserts to be the true facts.”
• “Within the constellation of relevant factors, the most important is the reason for the particular oversight.”
• “At a bare minimum, a party who seeks relief from judgment ... must offer a convincing explanation as to why the neglect was excusable.” (quoting Cintrón-Lorenzo v. Depar-tamento de Asuntos del Consumidor, 312 F.3d 522, 527 (1st Cir. 2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).