Skip to main content
· 7/25/2008

Nano-Proprietary, Inc. v. Canon, Inc.

Citations

  • 537 F.3d 394
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15928
  • 2008 WL 2854816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding license agreement granting licensee irrevocable, fully paid-up, and perpetual license could not be terminated even for licensee’s material breach of agreement
  • “The term irrevocable is defined as ‘unalterable; committed beyond recall’ or ‘impossible to retract or revoke.’” (alterations omitted) (first quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 848 (8th ed. 2004); next quoting The American Heritage College Dictionary 719 (3d ed. 1993)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Benavides, Owen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.