Nankervis v. Nankervis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the REAL ID Act no longer requires the trier of fact to find a nexus between inconsistencies and the ‘heart of the claim’ ”
• holding that the Immigration Judge properly considered the totality of the circumstances in finding that the applicant lacked credibility based on his demeanor, implausible testimony, lack of corroboration, and inconsistent statements
• noting that it is not appropriate for the BIA to consider an issue not raised before an IJ for the first time on appeal
• noting that claims not raised before the IJ are “not appropriate for [the BIA] to consider . . . for the first time on appeal”
• finding that “the REAL ID Act no longer requires the trier of fact to find a nexus between inconsistencies and the ‘heart of the claim’”
• finding that “the REAL ID Act no longer requires the trier of fact to find a nexus between inconsistencies and the ‘heart of the claim’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).