Nanini v. Nanini

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the chosen state’s law will govern a contractual relationship as long as the 4 MANS v. LAWSON Decision of the Court chosen law has some nexus with the parties or the contract
• applying Illinois law and concluding that \exact dollar value\ of parties' property need not be shown at time of execution of agreement
• applying Illinois law and concluding that “exact dollar value” of parties’ property need not be shown at time of execution of agreement
• “When the parties choose the law of a particular state to govern their contractual relationship and the chosen law has some nexus with the parties or the contract, that law will generally be applied.”
• “When the parties 26 choose the law of a particular state to govern their contractual relationship and the chosen 27 law has some nexus with the parties or the contract, that law will generally be applied.”
• “When the parties choose the law of a 7 particular state to govern their contractual relationship and the chosen law has some nexus 8 with the parties or the contract, that law will generally be applied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilson v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1996-05-03· cited 196×
• Friezo v. Friezo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-06· cited 60×
• Sanford v. Sanford
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-03-09· cited 41×
• Winsor v. Glasswerks PHX, L.L.C.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-02-04· cited 33×
• Delong v. Merrill
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-09-27· cited 15×
• Estate of Thies v. Lowe
  Montana Supreme Court· 1995-09-21· cited 12×
• Silverman v. Silverman
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2019-02-28· cited 8×
• DeLoach v. Alfred
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-03-17· cited 3×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Gulf Insurance v. Grisham
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-06-17· cited 72×
• In RE MARRIAGE OF LEVY v. Levy
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1986-06-10· cited 58×
• Volid v. Volid
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-06-28· cited 40×
• Joseph, Md v. Markovitz, Md
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-06-29· cited 39×
• In Re Marriage of Kloster
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-09-24· cited 36×
• Northern Contracting Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-12-19· cited 33×
• Elerick v. Rocklin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-03-15· cited 32×
• Eule v. Eule
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-11-21· cited 25×
• In Re Estate of Hopkins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-02-26· cited 23×
• Yockey v. Marion
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1915-10-27· cited 23×
• Collins v. Phillips
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1913-06-18· cited 20×
• In Re Marriage of Burgess
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-01· cited 16×
• Gibralter Escrow Co. v. Thomas J. Grosso Investment, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-12-27· cited 13×
• Kuhnen v. Kuhnen
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1933-02-23· cited 7×