Skip to main content
· 11/29/1990

Nanini v. Nanini

Citations

  • 802 P.2d 438
  • 166 Ariz. 287
  • 75 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 82
  • 1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the chosen state’s law will govern a contractual relationship as long as the 4 MANS v. LAWSON Decision of the Court chosen law has some nexus with the parties or the contract
  • applying Illinois law and concluding that \exact dollar value\ of parties' property need not be shown at time of execution of agreement
  • applying Illinois law and concluding that “exact dollar value” of parties’ property need not be shown at time of execution of agreement
  • “When the parties choose the law of a particular state to govern their contractual relationship and the chosen law has some nexus with the parties or the contract, that law will generally be applied.”
  • “When the parties 26 choose the law of a particular state to govern their contractual relationship and the chosen 27 law has some nexus with the parties or the contract, that law will generally be applied.”
  • “When the parties choose the law of a 7 particular state to govern their contractual relationship and the chosen law has some nexus 8 with the parties or the contract, that law will generally be applied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Fernandez, Roll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.