Nangle v. Cudahy Packing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a statute contains a specific provision and a more general related provision, the specific provision controls
• stating that the court is \an institution that the people of this state must be able to hold in the highest regard\
• stating that the court is “an institution that the people of this state must be able to hold in the highest regard”
• “Having decided that respondent was in violation of a specific, controlling judicial canon, we conclude that it is inappropriate to also consider whether respondent created a general appearance of impropriety under Canon 2, as urged by the examiner.”
• “[Wjhere a statute contains a specific statutory provision and a related, but more general, provision, the specific one controls.”
• “[I]t is a settled rule of statutory construction that where a statute contains a specific statutory provision and a related, but more general, provision, the specific one controls.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).