Skip to main content
· 9/13/2013

Nancy M. v. John M.

Citations

  • 308 P.3d 1130
  • 2013 WL 5020926
  • 2013 Alas. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that detailed findings were unnecessary for income tax deduction allocation to father with clear evidence that father will have majority of physical custody
  • noting that, except in specified circumstances, AS 25.24.152 does not restrict superior court’s discretion to grant noncustodial parent right to claim child as dependent under federal income laws
  • reviewing tax exemption allocation for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Winfree, Maassen, Bolger, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.