Nancy M. Kratzer v. Rockwell Collins, Inc., David A. Bellendier, and Eugene R. Nedved

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that direct evidence is evidence that “indicate[s] a discriminatory attitude was more likely than not a motivating factor in the employer’s decision”
• concluding that an employee demonstrates she is qualified when she “actually performs her job at a level that [meets her] employer’s legitimate expectations” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
• concluding that employee caused the breakdown in the interactive process when she failed to obtain the updated physical evaluation as promised so the employer could determine what accommodation was needed
• concluding that employee caused the breakdown in the interactive process when she failed to obtain the updated physical evaluation as promised so the employer could determine what accommodation was needed
• holding that an employee did not show she was objectively qualified as “[t]here is no dispute that [the plaintiff] could not physically accomplish the 408B test,” which was part of the “minimum objective criteria” of her role
• finding that an employee failed to request an accommodation when she did not obtain an updated physical exam

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).