Nancy Dickenson, Conservator for Sandra Robinson v. Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery of Eastern Tennessee, P.C. And Robert Rosser, M.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court abused its discretion in excluding a doctor’s standard-of-care testimony that was “supported by extensive relevant experience”
• holding that district court abused discretion by excluding physician’s testimony based on extensive, relevant experience despite absence of medical literature supporting opinion
• holding that the district court abused its discretion in excluding a doctor’s standard-of-care testimony that was “supported by extensive relevant experience”
• holding that a cardiac surgeon could testify about when to remove a ventilation tube
• holding the district court abused its discretion in excluding a doctor’s standard-of-care testimony that was “supported by extensive relevant experience”
• holding the district court abused its discretion in excluding a doctor’s standard of care testimony that was “supported by extensive relevant experience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).