Nancy Deitchman, Paula Renfroe, and Dr. Arthur L. Herbst, Witness-Appellee v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \a judge abuses his discretion when his decision is based on an erroneous conclusion of law\
• scientific study by non-party; defendant permitted discovery of factual material only, not material reflecting researcher’s ideas or stating his yet unpublished conclusions
• “a judge abuses his discretion when his decision is based on an erroneous conclusion of law”
• denial of access to data of scientific study would effectively preclude defendant drug manufacturer from engaging in any meaningful cross-examination of plaintiff's experts’ opinions which are based on the study
• “Generally, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow broad discovery . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).