Skip to main content
· 3/1/1985

Nancy CANO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant, Appellee

Citations

  • 755 F.2d 221
  • 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 209
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30387
  • 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Since we hold that tolling is not justified in this instance, Cano’s failure to file her charge of discrimination within the required time period bars relief in the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Coffin, Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.