Skip to main content
· 3/24/1987

Nance v. Librarian of Congress

Citations

  • 661 F. Supp. 794
  • 43 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 553
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiff’s expert in Title VII case had “no probative value” where he “had no experience” rating defendant agency’s employees, was unfamiliar with actual responsibilities position in question, and “made inaccurate assumptions as to what qualities the job entailed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gesell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.