Nance v. Cash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting twelve months’ confinement in SHU is a “sufficient” deprivation to trig- • ger due process protection
• “There is no proof that a surveillance videotape of the holding pen existed at the time plaintiff requested it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).