Skip to main content
· 8/23/1984

Nan E. Matthews v. Worthen Bank & Trust Company

Citations

  • 741 F.2d 217
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “[FCRA] was intended to apply only to reports which relate to the consumer’s eligibility for personal credit or other commercial benefits as a consumer, and not to the consumer’s business transactions” (citation omitted)
  • “We find that this particular transaction was exempt from the FCRA because the credit report was used solely for a commercial transaction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ross, McMillian, Fagg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.