· 8/23/1984
Nan E. Matthews v. Worthen Bank & Trust Company
Citations
- 741 F.2d 217
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the “[FCRA] was intended to apply only to reports which relate to the consumer’s eligibility for personal credit or other commercial benefits as a consumer, and not to the consumer’s business transactions” (citation omitted)
- “We find that this particular transaction was exempt from the FCRA because the credit report was used solely for a commercial transaction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ross, McMillian, Fagg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.