Nan Ching Zhang v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accused waived objection to SJA’s erroneous reporting of findings; SJA’s improper inclusion of testimony from pretrial investigation, to bolster sufficiency of evidence of guilt, was not prejudicial
• although Article 60, UCMJ, does not require an SJAR to advise on the legal sufficiency of the evidence, if the SJAR does so it must be done correctly by limiting the analysis to the evidence admitted at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).