· 2/11/1998
Namur v. Habitat Co.
Citations
- 691 N.E.2d 782
- 294 Ill. App. 3d 1007
- 229 Ill. Dec. 309
- 1998 Ill. App. LEXIS 68
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the plaintiffs’ claim for commingling the security deposit accrued when it was deposited and their claim for failing to attach a summary of the RLTO accrued when the lease was offered to the plaintiffs
- finding that the plaintiffs' claim for commingling the security deposit accrued when it was deposited and their claim for failing to attach a summary of the RLTO accrued when the lease was offered to the plaintiffs
- section 5-12-080(f) is penal because it specifies a formula by which the amount of damage is to be calculated
- section 5 — 12—080(f) is penal because it specifies a formula by which the amount of damage is to be calculated
- “[w]e do not need to decide whether the discovery rule applies to this cause of action” for other reasons
- an ordinance is a municipal statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cerda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.