Skip to main content
· 2/11/1998

Namur v. Habitat Co.

Citations

  • 691 N.E.2d 782
  • 294 Ill. App. 3d 1007
  • 229 Ill. Dec. 309
  • 1998 Ill. App. LEXIS 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiffs’ claim for commingling the security deposit accrued when it was deposited and their claim for failing to attach a summary of the RLTO accrued when the lease was offered to the plaintiffs
  • finding that the plaintiffs' claim for commingling the security deposit accrued when it was deposited and their claim for failing to attach a summary of the RLTO accrued when the lease was offered to the plaintiffs
  • section 5-12-080(f) is penal because it specifies a formula by which the amount of damage is to be calculated
  • section 5 — 12—080(f) is penal because it specifies a formula by which the amount of damage is to be calculated
  • “[w]e do not need to decide whether the discovery rule applies to this cause of action” for other reasons
  • an ordinance is a municipal statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cerda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.