Nami v. Fauver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “double celling can amount to an Eight Amendment violation if combined with other adverse conditions.”
• noting that when considering a motion to dismiss, this Court does “not inquire whether the plaintiffs will ultimately prevail”
• holding that on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the court “do[es] not inquire whether the plaintiffs will ultimately prevail, only whether they are entitled to offer evidence to support their claims” (citing Scheuer, 416 U.S. at 235)
• holding that on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the court “do[es] not inquire whether the plaintiffs will ultimately prevail, only whether they are entitled to offer evidence to support their claims” (citing Scheuer, 416 U.S. at 235)
• holding that on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the court “do[es] not inquire whether the plaintiffs will ultimately prevail, only whether they are entitled to offer evidence to support their claims” (citing Scheuer, 416 U.S. at 235)
• explaining that “to determine whether conditions of confinement violate the Eighth Amendment, it is necessary to examine the totality of the conditions at the institution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).