· 4/24/1996
Namey v. Reilly
Citations
- 926 F. Supp. 5
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7315
- 1996 WL 254101
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing Sacramento Sheriff’s Department from 9 section 1983 action “with prejudice” because it “is a subdivision of a local government 10 entity,” i.e., Sacramento County
- finding on summary judgment that claim against newly added 8 defendant was not time-barred and that relation back applied, where plaintiff put forth “facts 9 plausibly showing” that new defendant had notice of the filing of the original complaint
- “Thus, when parole officers prepare materials upon which the parole board will rely when making decisions to grant, deny, or revoke parole, they are protected by absolute immunity from damages liability.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tauro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.