Skip to main content
· 7/1/1999

Nam v. Montgomery County

Citations

  • 732 A.2d 356
  • 127 Md. App. 172
  • 1999 Md. App. LEXIS 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “service of process on the intended defendant is not essential to stop the running of limitations .... ”
  • “The LGTCA . . . does not authorize the maintenance of a suit directly against the local government.”
  • “When the state gives a city or county part of its police power to exercise, the city or county to that extent is the state.”
  • because court dismissed “John Doe, M.D.” with prejudice upon plaintiffs’ request, at a time when they knew his identity, plaintiffs were estopped to later amend claim to add him as a defendant
  • “Nowhere in the Act, however, is there a waiver of immunity so that the governmental entity is subject to being made a party to an action based upon its employee’s or agent’s tortious acts.”
  • “Nowhere in the Act, however, is there a waiver of immunity so that the governmental entity is subject to being made a party to an action based upon its employee’s or agent’s tortious acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.