Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/1/1999

Nam v. Montgomery County

Citations

732 A.2d 356
127 Md. App. 172
1999 Md. App. LEXIS 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “service of process on the intended defendant is not essential to stop the running of limitations .... ”
“The LGTCA . . . does not authorize the maintenance of a suit directly against the local government.”
“When the state gives a city or county part of its police power to exercise, the city or county to that extent is the state.”
because court dismissed “John Doe, M.D.” with prejudice upon plaintiffs’ request, at a time when they knew his identity, plaintiffs were estopped to later amend claim to add him as a defendant
“Nowhere in the Act, however, is there a waiver of immunity so that the governmental entity is subject to being made a party to an action based upon its employee’s or agent’s tortious acts.”
“Nowhere in the Act, however, is there a waiver of immunity so that the governmental entity is subject to being made a party to an action based upon its employee’s or agent’s tortious acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.