Skip to main content
· 2/14/1986

Nally v. Heckler

Citations

  • 638 F. Supp. 453
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing between assertions of being paid to lie and merely lying where former can be proved true or false whereas latter epithet “merely expressed an opinion which cannot be held libelous however mistaken the opinion might be”
  • “We do not believe that the press may be required under the First Amendment to suppress newsworthy statements merely because it has serious doubts regarding their truth”
  • special protection afforded to “neutral reportage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zobel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.