Nalivaika v. Murphy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that because third-party litigation was necessary to protect plaintiffs' interests, litigation expenses reasonably incurred in suit were recoverable
• defendant fraudulently misrepresented status of real estate sold to plaintiff resulting in suit against plaintiff by third party
• agreement to indemnify party from “any claim” not specific enough to support allowance of attorneys’ fees
• indemnity agreement providing defendants “ ‘further agree to indemnify [plaintiff] *** from any claim of [third-party plaintiffs]’ ” was not specific enough to support an award of attorney fees because the agreement did not mention attorney fees
• indemnity agreement providing defendants \'further agree to indemnify [plaintiff] *** from any claim of [third-party plaintiffs]'\ was not specific enough to support an award of attorney fees because the agreement did not mention attorney fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).