Nakaula v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dechning to award “fees for fees” for portion of EAJA application that was unsuccessful and quoting Jean, 496 U.S. at 163 n. 10, 110 S.Ct. at 2321 n. 10
• stating “[i]n order to obtain review by the Court of Veterans Appeals of a final decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals [“BVA”], a person adversely affected by that action must file a notice of appeal with the Court”
• Court found that it did not have authority to retain general and continuing jurisdiction over decision remanded to Board for new adjudication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).