Nakashima v. Oregon State Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Board of Education applied an incorrect legal standard and remanding to the board to apply the correct standard
• concluding that the Board of Education applied an incorrect legal standard and remanding to the board to apply the correct standard
• concluding that the Board of Education applied an incorrect legal standard and remanding to the board to apply the correct standard
• court examined legislative history to confirm that federal law was the source of distinctive terminology in statute
• “A religious accommodation must be ‘measured’ so that it does not ‘override other significant interests.’”
• “[Regardless of the parties’ arguments, we are obligated to construe the statute correctly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).