Naito v. Naito

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the diminution of the plaintiffs’ involvement in and influence over corporate policy was the result of having shifted from being 50 percent shareholders to a minority position and that the defendants, having become the majority, acted within their rights in making decisions
• “Majority or other controlling shareholders owe fiduciary duties of loyalty, good faith, fair dealing and full disclosure to the minority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).