Skip to main content
· 6/19/2009

Na'im v. Clinton

Citations

  • 626 F. Supp. 2d 63
  • 2009 WL 1743642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Plaintiff failed to show racial animus because she could not tie “loud” to her race rather than her character
  • “[T]he plaintiff must establish a causal connection between the harassment and her protected activity to succeed on the [retaliation-based hostile work environment] claim.”
  • applying same analysis in retaliation context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.