Nails v. LaPlante

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that plaintiffs do “not have a constitutional right to the treatment of their choice,” and “[m]ere disagreement with prison officials about what constitutes appropriate care” is not sufficient to state a constitutional claim
• dismissing case where plaintiff “does not include any non-conclusory allegations of discriminatory animus or ill will based on his disability”
• granting summary judgment to defendants on plaintiff’s ADA claim because the plaintiff “d[id] not include any non-conclusory allegations of discriminatory animus or ill will based on his disability”
• “Inmates do not have a constitutional right to the treatment of their choice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).