Skip to main content
· 4/6/2000

Naidu v. United States

Citations

  • 93 F. Supp. 2d 577
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4899
  • 2000 WL 381744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the second step of the discretionary function exception was satisfied where the decision in question involved the weighing of the competing interests of public safety and historic preservation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.