· 4/6/2000
Naidu v. United States
Citations
- 93 F. Supp. 2d 577
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4899
- 2000 WL 381744
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the second step of the discretionary function exception was satisfied where the decision in question involved the weighing of the competing interests of public safety and historic preservation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.