Skip to main content
· 6/14/1956

Nagler v. Admiral Corp.

Citations

  • 144 F. Supp. 772
  • 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2845
  • 1956 Trade Cas. (CCH) 68,449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing fraud claim requiring veil piercing where the complaint failed to allege “the use of domination to cause the injury”
  • declining to pierce corporate veil in action for breach of contract and fraud
  • dismissing claim to pierce corporate veil where allegations were “conclusory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Palmieri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.