Nagle v. Hines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the damages in this [chapter 13] case are to property and not to person, the plaintiff’s arguments in favor of a nondischargeable judgment based upon a willful and malicious injury are rejected.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).