Nagel-Taylor Automotive Supplies, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recovery allowed despite clearly unreasonable estimate of lost profits; jury rejected evidence that insured was complicit in arson
• recovery allowed despite clearly unreasonable estimate of lost profits; jury rejected evidence that insured was complicit in arson
• recovery allowed despite clearly unreasonable estimate of lost profits; jury rejected evidence that insured was complicit in arson

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).